Re: Ram vs Dakota

From: Joe t (fordf-series@juno.com)
Date: Thu Sep 17 1998 - 17:24:21 EDT


On Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:25:08 PDT charles wilt <cwilt@hotmail.com> writes:
>I have the 1800 pound payload option and have had a 1200 pound load in
>mine. The Dak pulled it with out a problem. I also have a 96 Ram 3500
>cummins with a custom made flat bed and bumpers. It will haul anything
>the Dak can't. I had 4 ton on it once. If you want someting to haul or
>tow with go for the 5.9 Ram. If you don't haul or tow often get the
>5.2 Dak.
>
>Charles "flat broke" Wilt
>98 4X4 SLT 5.2 Dakota CC Loaded, 32x11.50 BFG AT
>98 SLT+ 5.9 Durango Loaded.
>96 4X2 SLT Cummins Ram CC Loaded, Custom bed & bumpers
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>

Is your dakota very easy to drive? How comfortable is it on long term
trips? About what is your MPG? Is it easier to drive than the Ram?
About how much was it's list's price? I see that it is an SLT. Did you
get the SLT or SLT Plus pakage??

Joe T.

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:51 EDT