I forget which government (probably ours), funded a study to determine the
impact of domesticated farm animal flatulence on the atmosphere. Gives a
whole new meaning to the term "Cat Back"...
gk
________________________________________________________________________
Gary E. Klim - Somewhere In Connecticut mailto:garyklim@snet.net
http://pages.cthome.net/garyklim/ mailto:gklim@harman.com
________________________________________________________________________
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Christopher
> Bogart
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 1998 7:01 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: DMLHere We Go Again was:: Late Daks w/o CATs
>
>
>
>
> Mike Crumley wrote:
>
> > At 02:53 PM 9/30/98 , you wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, yep you do have a point there. I'm certain there are localized
> > >effects, I'm just not convinced that this stuff is having any effect
> > >on a global scale.
> >
> > Well, maybe when you have to start lining your underwear with
> foil when you
> > go outside to keep from getting sterilized... :-)
>
> You mentioned being 50 miles from a city. Clouds travel more than
> fifty miles.
> When it rains in your town, it's raining pollutants picked up
> from whatever
> city you are close too. That's a fact. Look at your nearby high
> pine trees if
> you have any. Notice how many are dying?? Notice how many tops of them are
> dead?? That's rain filled with city pollutants.
SNIP, SNIP, yet more SNIP...
> Bogart
>
> An opinion is worth what you paid for it. Nothing!
>
> Or is it?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:12 EDT