Brad,
My experience with the MP engine controller (95 and older) shows that the
controller gets very aggressive with the ignition and fuel maps. Under WOT,
the engines
(both 318 and 360) tend to be very rich and tend to ping with fuels with an
octane rating of 92 or less. I haven't had the opportunity to try one of the
MP computers
on a 96. I would imagine that the big bore throttle body would work quite
well these controllers and we will be testing this very soon. Mopar
Performance currently
does not have a controller for the 97 and newer trucks. Our testing has been
on 98 5.9L engines, both with JET chips. Both trucks tend to lean out under
WOT and
we are working on this. I think that the MP computer will come closer than
the JET on the 95 and older trucks. Hopefully we will be testing this
combination next
week.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: N2mopars@aol.com [SMTP:N2mopars@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 4:51 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: TB Mod Question for the Pro's
>
> In a message dated 98-10-05 20:36:30 EDT, you write:
>
> << Jon,
> The stage II still has the air horns (not milled flat). We wanted to
> increase the flow without removing these (looks stock). We increased the
> flow by increasing
> the throttle bore size, removing half of the throttle shaft (Colin's
> idea),
> and installing thinner throttle plates. Bruce actually has pictures of
> the
> stage II and hopefully
> the new throttle shaft to send to you. I do want to flow a TB with the
> horns
> removed for my own knowledge, but with the stage II, it appears that we
> have
> reached
> the limits of the JET chip. On my truck, the engine goes flat above 4,200
> RPM. Dan at JET is working with us on a custom chip to match the air flow
> of
> the throttle body. I sh >>
>
>
> How would this Stage II work with an MP SBEC?
>
> Brad
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:33 EDT