I was looking through the archives and all these people were saying that
MSD made them slower. Whats the deal?
Bill
'97 SS/T
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Glen Renzoni wrote:
> Richard, I have had the MSD 6A ignition on my last 2 Dakotas (should have
> gone with the 6AL, but my '99 R/T will get it). I loved it. It's simple,
> and reasonably priced. It definitely helped (my last Dak, a '95 sport with
> 318, 5-speed, and 3.90 rear put out 300hp and still got 20mpg), the mileage
> started at 17mpg, and improved with the MSD and other performance parts. I
> tried a Jacobs ignition on a '91 Ramcharger with a 318, and I wasn't really
> impressed, especially considering the price. Hope this helped. Let me know
> if you try one of the other ignitions, and how you like it. Thanks, Glen.
>
> ----------
> > From: V8dakLECC@aol.com
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: Aftermarket ignitions
> > Date: Saturday, October 17, 1998 10:34 AM
> >
> > In a message dated 10/16/98 4:23:58 PM EST, cameyer@bw.edu writes:
> >
> > << which one. I've narrowed it down to the MSD-6AL, Crane Fireball HI-6,
> > Accel 300+, and the Jacobs complete one. I heard that the Accel is the
> > best bang-for-the-buck and that the MSD is getting outdated by these
> > others...but MSD is coming out with a new digital ignition. Anyone
> heard
> > anything that will help?
> > >>
> >
> > Check the archives - Consensus seems to be that stock ignition is best -
> and
> > yes there are some well documented examples.
> >
> > Richard Lewis
> > 92 LE CC, 318, Auto
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:40 EDT