I whole heartedly agree. If you'll check the July 97 archives you'll see that I
apologized to Jules if I had given the impression that he was trying to rip people
off(I also complimented his TBI workmanship). I suggested to him at that time that
a simple apology would be enough to resolve things between us. He never apologized
to me.
I am, however delighted that he has apologized to the list and I hope his most
recent behavior will be maintained.
Andre
Shaun.Hendricks@bergenbrunswig.com wrote:
> I am impressed that Jules apologized for this fray (even thoug he isn't
> totally at fault for it), to that end I was pleasantly surprised and must
> apologize myself for underestimating Jules. He could have let the whole thing
> just die and came back later without an apology. I don't expect everyone to
> feel they owe an apology for anything, but to those that exacerbated the
> situation, you would be wise to learn from Jules in how to admit a mistake. I
> have no problems with anyone who admits a mistake and am usually willing to
> give them another chance, forgiveness is free, hatred and anger have a price
> that must be paid for the rest of your life (I had to learn this the hard way).
> Jules, I applaud your apology. I will certainly ask you for a catalog
> (even though I'm not intending to turn my truck into a racer) but I don't know
> if you can compete with my supplier... he gets me Mopar parts at 10% over
> cost, but that doesn't mean you don't have items that Mopar doesn't build!
> I certainly would like to see Frank and Bruces TB project completed as
> well, I've always felt that the more you approach a problem from different
> directions, the better the solution. It's good to see the list getting back
> to Dakota talk. Thank you all for reading this bit o' fluff.
>
> Shaun H.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:45 EDT