Re: Were's the beef? Was no Reg. test-rained out

• Next message: Robert Trottmann: "WHEELS ON!!!"
• Previous message: mike d. (Michael Z-Sykes): "ooV6 & the Force"
• In reply to: Whit: "Were's the beef? Was no Reg. test-rained out"
• Next in thread: Ron Merx: "Re: Were's the beef? Was no Reg. test-rained out"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Whit wrote:

[...]
> I'm not sure why they have chosen to build such a mild engine but my guess
> is that either they were having emision problems with more cam or mileage
> problems using outdated technology. I think it is time for Mopar to invest
> in a little R&D to catch up. I know they can do it, they did after all
> make the Hemi and the V10. How about a new all aluminum small black Hemi
> with all the latest technology. Now that would be something.
>

    Didn't they do that already? A little while ago, some people were
saying that CC and/or Mopar Performance was working on getting CARB
approval on an aluminum block, fuel injected version of the MP 426 HEMI
crate motor. Any word on what's happening with that?

                                              -Jon-

  .--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ----------------------------------------.
  | Jon Steiger * AOPA, DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA * RP-SEL |
  | '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT CC (14.58@93.55), '96 Kolb FireFly 447 |
  `--------------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'

• Next message: Robert Trottmann: "WHEELS ON!!!"
• Previous message: mike d. (Michael Z-Sykes): "ooV6 & the Force"
• In reply to: Whit: "Were's the beef? Was no Reg. test-rained out"
• Next in thread: Ron Merx: "Re: Were's the beef? Was no Reg. test-rained out"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:58 EDT