Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights

From: Boog318@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 04 1998 - 22:12:54 EST

Next message: Elmer Hanhart: "Re: Re:"
Previous message: Leonard Zuniga: "Re: TBI Magnum Performance"
Next in thread: Jules Glogovcsan: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Maybe reply: Jules Glogovcsan: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Reply: Jon Steiger: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Awwhhh...this is cool. A dakota list brings two ultra-lite flyers together.
I've never flown one, Ive never flown anything but I think it would be lots of
fun. What are the top speeds of these things?
ttyl
Boog

Next message: Elmer Hanhart: "Re: Re:"
Previous message: Leonard Zuniga: "Re: TBI Magnum Performance"
Next in thread: Jules Glogovcsan: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Maybe reply: Jules Glogovcsan: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Reply: Jon Steiger: "Re: DML:was 3.9 vs 5.2 -Reply...was Dak weight..now ultralights"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:58 EDT