Deep pocketed lobbiests (sp) working for the oil companies! IMHO,
They'll make sure gasoline burning motors are here for a long time. Tis
a shame too, seeing as how us boys in the NC mountains could make lotsa
fuel for our trucks!
Jon_Smith
>From owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net Thu Nov 5 11:25:48 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net
(8.8.7/8.7.3) id NAA19733 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998
13:50:33 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet9.buffnet.net (buffnet9.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.19]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id
NAA19729 for <dakota-truck>; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:50:31 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by
buffnet9.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
> id xma005071; Thu, 5 Nov 98 13:49:40 -0500
>Received: from send204.yahoomail.com (send204.yahoomail.com
[205.180.60.158])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA25719
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:51:41 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from aengstle@yahoo.com)
>Message-ID: <19981105185124.4839.rocketmail@send204.yahoomail.com>
>Received: from [204.69.149.100] by send204.yahoomail.com; Thu, 05 Nov
1998 10:51:24 PST
>Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:51:24 -0800 (PST)
>From: Al Engstler <aengstle@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: DML: More powerful Motors
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
>X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
>X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
>X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
majordomo@buffnet.net.
>X-Unsubscribe-URL:
http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
>
>All I have to say is that any new technology will not catch on until
>it is "as good or better" than what we currently have. From what I
>have seen or read they have more work to do to get new technologies to
>work in a practical,safe (crash testing) and reliable manner. If the
>government gets involved in pushing new tech. vehicles then they may
>just outlaw certain vehicles. A lot of the reason now for people to
>collect old cars is just to have a chance to still hear an old V8 wind
>out and squealling tires. At some point we are going to have to let go
>and embrace newer vehicles for better or worse. We can't keep flooding
>the roads with fossil fuel burning machines, at some point we degrade
>air quality too much.
>Also, why can't we run our current technology motors on alcohol? This
>is a renuable resource, would give farmers somewhere to sell their
>corn, and would
>be a cleaner burning fuel.
>Sorry for the long post,better get back to work
>Al
>
>
>
>
>
>---Shaun.Hendricks@bergenbrunswig.com wrote:
>>
>> <shudder> Say it ain't so! Mebbe I should start stockpiling
>engines for
>> the future. :-)
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:58 EDT