Re: RE: 360 magnum heads

From: Klaus Wilkens (klaus@buffnet.net)
Date: Sat Nov 14 1998 - 05:38:54 EST


FWIW

Sound like your friend made a major mistake!

Dyno Jet is a low cost "chassis dyno". Given the engine probably was not
optimized or the readings corrected plus running mufflers and acessories I
think 310 at the rear wheels is pretty good.

Alan J. Thompson wrote:

> >From a friend that purchased one, dyno tested on a DYNOJET machine, and
> returned it due to its 310hp output. I apologize for not being more
> specific. Maybe just a fluke though...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Jules
> Glogovcsan
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 1998 11:54 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: 360 magnum heads
>
> ----------
> > From: Alan J. Thompson <vladimir@texas.net>
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: RE: DML: RE: 360 magnum heads
> > Date: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 10:00 PM
> >
> > The 380hp crate motors do not, I repeat, DO NOT, put out 380hp. These
> > motors are leftover parts Chrysler has had laying around for years.
>
> please share with us where you got this info... this is not as i understand
> it from those connected with the co that builds the 380 crate motors...
>
> jam'n



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT