RE: [Fwd: Headers legal?]

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Mon Dec 21 1998 - 20:34:29 EST


Who sells the Headers??

(Hope they're not chrome..I hate "Heat Pump Headers") :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> ashort@flash.net
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 7:12 PM
> Subject: [Fwd: DML: Headers legal?]
>
>
>
> Mopar/Leach headers are 50 state legal and have a CARB certification #.
> Unless you don't live in the 50 States, the headers are legal. Now,
> whatever problems state inspectors will give you is a personal/human
> problem. Give some people a little authority over someone elses
> happiness and you can never tell what the result will be. Alan S.
>
> --------------18FD3B5442DF
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Return-Path: <owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>
> Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
> by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25879;
> Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:51:01 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net
> (8.8.7/8.7.3) id RAA13292 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec
> 1998 17:49:33 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from buffnet9.buffnet.net (buffnet9.buffnet.net
> [205.246.19.19]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP
> id RAA13287 for <dakota-truck>; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 17:49:31 -0500 (EST)
> From: Toomey2me@aol.com
> Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by
> buffnet9.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
> id xma008812; Mon, 21 Dec 98 17:46:28 -0500
> Received: from imo19.mx.aol.com (imo19.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.9])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA19945
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 17:49:17
> -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from Toomey2me@aol.com)
> Received: from Toomey2me@aol.com
> by imo19.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id VDVBa11365
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 17:46:15
> -0500 (EST)
> Message-ID: <39206206.367ecfb7@aol.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 17:46:15 EST
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Subject: DML: Headers legal?
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
> Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
> X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
> X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
> X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
> majordomo@buffnet.net.
> X-Unsubscribe-URL:
> http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-> BIN/dml.html
>
> Hey
> all,
>
> I was talking to some of my friends and
> they told me that headers are illegal
> here in California. They said it wouldn't pass smog. Are any headers legal
> here in california? Also, will my Flowmaster 2 chamber make my
> truck illegal?
> I have the 3.9 V-6.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> 2me
> www.smokindakota.com
>
>
> --------------18FD3B5442DF--
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:29 EDT