My wife is a professional photo printer, and I could not talk here into getting
a real hi res digital camaera for xmas(kodak260) They are coveneint but I am
just scanning untill the price goes down .
Vladimir Ryall wrote:
> I will take exception here. I have the Kodak DC-210Plus. When you set the
> resolution to its highest, best quality, the images are better than any 35mm
> I have ever seen. You also have the ability to do enhancements before the
> final cut. One other good point, NO FILM or DEVELOPING COST. Come on you
> old farts out there, step up and join the rest of us old farts...
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> DodgeBoyz3@aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 1999 9:34 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Digital camersa (non Dak related)
>
> In a message dated 02-01-99 7:10:16 PM Central Standard Time,
> fawcett@uism.bu.edu writes:
>
> > I go back to my 35mm Nikon's and have the images scanned (I
> > guess that makes me an old fart?! ;-)
>
> Yeah, guess I'm an old fart too :-)
>
> The Nikon does deliver some nice detail that the digitals seem to lose.
> Clarity is a bit better too.
>
> Gene in Baytown
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:51 EDT