If we count 1 A. D. as the first year in our time system, you're
absolutely correct. I've realized this for a number of years, but plan to
remain silent about it until January 2000. The reason? The "eve of the
21st century" party is going to be awesome, so I want to enjoy it on Dec
31, 1999, then remind everybody that we're not really in the new
millennium, so we have to do it again on Dec 31, 2000.....pretty stupid
reasoning, I know, but hey....
Dak content: My Dak is staying in my garage on Dec 31 in both 1999 and
2000 (no drunk, including me, is going to wreck it)!!
David Gloff
'99 Intense Blue Dakota Sport CC 318 5-speed 3.92SG 4x2 with all the
trimmings
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Michael Clark wrote:
> Sorry, I'm usually pretty good about not posting non-dak stuff but this
> is buggin' me.
>
> Is it just me or am I the only one who has realized that 2000 will NOT
> be the start of the new millenium? The new millenium doesn't start
> until 1-1-2001 right? Today I heard Peter Jennings refer to 2000 as the
> new mellenium! Someone tell me I'm right on this, I can't believe so
> many people are wrong...
>
> ---Mike, (Jon fried my brain) near Houston.---
> My sig file=====> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/signature.txt
> My Dakota page==> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/dakota.html
> Dakota Webring==> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/webring/ring.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:52 EDT