>Of course the leap year is a problem as well, every four years we have a
>leap year, well we also have a leap year every thousand years, the year 2000
>has two leap years right on each other so they cancel each other out and it
>will not be a leap year, but if you look at older calanders you will see
>that they have it beeing a leap year based of the every 4 year theory.
Wrong Brian. The leap year rule is every four years, except century years
(ending in 00), except if the year can be divided by 400, in which case it
IS a leap year. Check your calendars. There IS a February 29th, 2000.
Jim
´93 4x4 CC V8
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:53 EDT