Re: Age?? -- Was Observation

From: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian (leefam@wcc.net)
Date: Fri Jan 15 1999 - 15:57:25 EST


At 02:18 PM 1/15/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>At 01:09 PM 1/14/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>>Steve wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow! A lot of wet-behind-the-ears whipper-snappers!
>>> I guess at 35 I must qualify for geezer status. :(
>>>
>>> Patiently waiting for delivery,
>>> Steve
>>
>> Got ya by a little. 37 in March. Alan S.
>>
>>
>
>Hmm...I'm 19!! Old people!! hehe...j/k! =)
>
>This thread is really interesting! In my town, you are either really
>young(i.e.17-22), or they actually are old - like 65+!! I don't see many
>people in their late 20's or 30's with Daks.
>
>
>Brian
>
>

Hmm....Maybe I need to take some Flintstone Vitamins.... "they actually
are old - like 65+!!" should have 'and own a Dakota' tacked on at the end
of it.

DUH!

Brian



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:01 EDT