Vladimir Ryall wrote:
>
> I have a buddy that has the RT Cam, it really wakes up the motor. HOwever,
> I chose slightly more aggressive specs for mine. Boy what a difference from
> the RT cam... The RT cam is definently a winner though. Make sure to
> install the new springs and retainers. Those Crower 1.7 rockers really work
> too, consider those as well.
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Jack Hilton
> III
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 1999 3:53 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: mopar cam for magnum engines
>
> I think the 45-50 HP is the total possible gain if you add all of the
> components , isn't it ?
>
> A.K.A. - Magnum R/T Kit
>
> At 01:36 PM 1/18/1999 -0800, you wrote:
> >I was scanning the PAW catalog and it shows a cam from Mopar for Magnum
> >engines. It say the cam requires a Mopar valve springs and retainer kit. Is
> >anyone using this cam? Any drivability problems? It claims to give 45 HP if
> >you have exhaust, air filter and a Mopar computer (SBEC).
> >
> >Alan
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Jack Hilton III
>
> Black 1998 Dodge Dakota R/T Club Cab
>
> Charter Pipeline......the Next Wave.....
>
> HEMI@charter.net
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
> ----------------------------------------------
Anyone know the specs for an R/T cam? How about a stock R/Tcam? How
much difference in lift/duration? Your cam is even bigger? How do you
pass emissions? Alan S.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:08 EDT