RE: Dyno results

From: Bridges, Bruce (bbridges@alarismed.com)
Date: Fri Jan 22 1999 - 16:27:44 EST


Alan,
damn, I thought hat throttle body was worth 50HP...NOT!! Oh well, the "new"
#s are a lot more real, but still not shabby! Sams '95 318 (same mods as
alan w/mopar SBEC,I get beat by it occasionally) Dynoed somewhere around
211HP?? Its gotta be that Mopar perf SBEC and less weight...I nail him
off the line by a truck length, but at the end of the track Im lookin at his
tail lights... This has gotta end soon!
BKB

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Short [mailto:ashort@flash.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 1:23 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Dyno results

Alan Short wrote:
>
> Hello all, went to the dyno this A.M. to make a pull on my '98 R/T.
> Fortunately, Eric (swede) used the same dyno a few months ago on his '99
> R/T. Eric's stock baseline #'s were: 190.5 hp
> / 248.9 ft. lbs.
> My R/T with mods: 272.0 hp / 280.6 ft. lbs.
> Better than I would have guessed, my mods are: JET II chip, 180 Stat,
> Elec Fans, MP Headers/y-pipe, ported throttle body. Impressive as it may
> sound, it isn't a lot faster than stock. Lots more bottom end, but
> doesn't G-Tech any faster over the 1/4. I don't necessarily put stock in
> the G-Tech #'s, that's why I dyno'ed it. Track opens in a couple weeks.
> I'll post my new times. Alan S.
After further studying, I have to ammend the dyno #'s. I gave hp/ft.lb.
PEAKS which take into consideration shift shock. The # sheet is also
different in format from Swede's. Mine is a line graph, his is a list by
rpm/100's from 3,700 to 4,900. My line graph has the real hp/ft.lb. #'s
in blue for pull # 1 & red for #2.
Best pull was #1 with 250.8 hp/229.1 ft.lbs
I thought 272/280 was a little high. I wish. Alan S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:11 EDT