Ryan D. Krokosinski wrote:
>
> That's still a pretty good pull considering only minor mods. Just one
> question. Are you sure about the torque numbers? They seem a little
> low. Shouldn't they be higher than the HP?
> Anyway, nice pull.
>
> Ryan K
> '99 R/T RC
>
> Alan Short wrote:
>
> Alan Short wrote:
> >
> > Hello all, went to the dyno this A.M. to make a pull on my
> '98 R/T.
> > Fortunately, Eric (swede) used the same dyno a few months
> ago on his '99
> > R/T. Eric's stock baseline #'s
> were: 190.5 hp
> > / 248.9 ft. lbs.
> > My R/T with mods: 272.0 hp / 280.6 ft.
> lbs.
> > Better than I would have guessed, my mods are: JET II
> chip, 180 Stat,
> > Elec Fans, MP Headers/y-pipe, ported throttle body.
> Impressive as it may
> > sound, it isn't a lot faster than stock. Lots more bottom
> end, but
> > doesn't G-Tech any faster over the 1/4. I don't
> necessarily put stock in
> > the G-Tech #'s, that's why I dyno'ed it. Track opens in a
> couple weeks.
> > I'll post my new times. Alan S.
> After further studying, I have to ammend the dyno #'s. I
> gave hp/ft.lb.
> PEAKS which take into consideration shift shock. The # sheet
> is also
> different in format from Swede's. Mine is a line graph, his
> is a list by
> rpm/100's from 3,700 to 4,900. My line graph has the real
> hp/ft.lb. #'s
> in blue for pull # 1 & red for #2.
> Best pull was #1 with 250.8 hp/229.1 ft.lbs
> I thought 272/280 was a little high. I wish. Alan S.
They seem to be reversed. Alan S.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:11 EDT