K, I tell ya what, you use your 87 octane and I will use my 93, and lets
line them up...
See ya there...
VLADIMIR
96 Indy "FASRAM"
http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
http://www.indyram.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Thomas Wood
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 1:55 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
I'm not disagreeing here. But could someone help me then. I have a 97 v6
that has 13,000 miles on it. at around 8,000 i started getting some spark
nock not under load, but rather when I was driving at a constant speed of
about 35 mph (tach at around 1800 to 2000). I tried 89 octane and that
didn't seem to make a difference. I now run 92 without nock. Should I go
to the dealer and ask them to adjust the timing. I wouldn't think that I
would have a carbon problem with only having this many miles on the truck.
Whattya think????
T. Matt
Harrisburg, PA
At 06:31 AM 1/26/99 EST, you wrote:
>for those people with stock compression,im telling you this.you are wasting
>your money on 93 octane and octance boost.it will not make you go faster it
>will more than likely slow you down since higher octane burns slower than
87
>would.higher octane was designed for higher compression motors.i thought
that
>i would share a little secrect to all dak loverslike myself.
>
> Roman
> 99 cc R/T
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:17 EDT