RE: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Jan 27 1999 - 23:21:59 EST


Shhhhh...it's Mopar Secret. If we tell you...we'll have to sell your truck,
use the money for a downpayment on a lowered Honda with a "Rice Powered"
sticker on the back window. :)

Jus kiddin....

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Vladimir
> Ryall
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 10:01 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: RE: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
>
>
> Why does Mopar Performance suggest you need to use 92 octane with the
> performance computer? I know, they must own oil company stock right.
> Seriously, why do they include a sticker for the instrument panel and the
> tank door?
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> Sweet350cc@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 5:32 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
>
>
> for those people with stock compression,im telling you this.you
> are wasting
> your money on 93 octane and octance boost.it will not make you go
> faster it
> will more than likely slow you down since higher octane burns
> slower than 87
> would.higher octane was designed for higher compression motors.i thought
> that
> i would share a little secrect to all dak loverslike myself.
>
> Roman
> 99 cc R/T
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:20 EDT