Hey Kelly...
Sheesh...what a line of @#$!.
Has this person actually taken a reading from the tailpipe on residual fuel
vapors?? If so...how did he come up with the 78%. Post the
facts/datasheets on your website.
Bernd D. Ratsch
Pflugerville, TX
bernd@texas.net
http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd
1997 Dakota SLT-CC (3.9L)
License Plate Frame: "Don't Follow Me...I'm Trolling for Toyota's"
Song for the Day: "Gonna buy me a Dodge Truck and blow those Fords off the
road....."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Patrick and
> Kelly Engram
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 2:50 PM
> To: DML
> Subject: DML: burns 78% of fuel mix
>
>
> "
> anyone verify this crap he spoke??? He even went as far as to
> say the
> Dak in stock condition only burned 78% of the fuel mix.
> What....A 78%
> burner, my ass it burns 78%. I guess I should have told him I
> run
> 14.8s.... I think I am with everyone else on this. "
>
> -Shoulda asked him how come your check engine light doesnt come on from
> such a rich mixture exiting the engine and the O2 sensor throwing a code
> to the computer!!! I'm sure the FEDS would like to talk to this guy so
> he can help them BUST Ma-Mopar for having such smoke factories running
> around.
> Then you should have asked him what kind of Mopar truck he drives!?!
> I hate when people spout off like they know what the heck they are
> talking about when they actually dont have a clue.
> Patrick
> ps-Call them back and tell him he was right. Your truck does burn 78%
> of the mixture because HIS wires are making the engine misfire!
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:37 EDT