Wasnt it 220 HP on the older magnums?
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: mrdancer <mrdancer@camalott.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:39 PM
Subject: DML: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
>Well, given the tolerances of factory motors, I'd say that 230hp as claimed
>by Chrysler could vary + or - 10%.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Z-Sykes <msykes@su.edu>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:09 PM
>Subject: DML: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
>
>
>>>>C- Did I state my hp at 250? I wouldn't be suprised if it was pretty
>>close
>>to that, or over. Talk to you after I make it to the Dyno<<<
>>
>>lets take a look at this....
>>stock motor 230 hp (as claimed by CC)
>>add headers... 15 hp
>>FABM... 5 hp..
>>
>>now get out your calculators boys and girls.. that equals 250! and that's
>>not all of R/T's mods, so I would say he has OVER 250... gee Robert, I
>>guess you were wrong =)
>>
>>-mike d.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:37 EDT