Re: Re: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames

From: Robert Trottmann (rotrottmann@davidson.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 17 1999 - 23:38:55 EST


Yes, it was 220, minus 10% equals 217.8 hp stock.....plus DT headers, Y pipe,
cat back, MP SBEC, ram air hood, F&B TB, 180 Tstat, 8.5mm wires, MSD 6AL.....I
think there is a possibility that I could maybe be a little over 250....just
maybe. Plus my 16X8 Centerlines add a few horses for looks. :-)
Later,
Robert

Chris lang wrote:

> Wasnt it 220 HP on the older magnums?
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mrdancer <mrdancer@camalott.com>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:39 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
>
> >Well, given the tolerances of factory motors, I'd say that 230hp as claimed
> >by Chrysler could vary + or - 10%.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Michael Z-Sykes <msykes@su.edu>
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> >Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:09 PM
> >Subject: DML: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
> >
> >
> >>>>C- Did I state my hp at 250? I wouldn't be suprised if it was pretty
> >>close
> >>to that, or over. Talk to you after I make it to the Dyno<<<
> >>
> >>lets take a look at this....
> >>stock motor 230 hp (as claimed by CC)
> >>add headers... 15 hp
> >>FABM... 5 hp..
> >>
> >>now get out your calculators boys and girls.. that equals 250! and that's
> >>not all of R/T's mods, so I would say he has OVER 250... gee Robert, I
> >>guess you were wrong =)
> >>
> >>-mike d.
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:37 EDT