true it would be hard pressed to see 100% from a stock car. however, I
think 78% is a bit low..... It just screams pollution police come and
beat me now...
Jason
2/18/99 8:37 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: William Blount Arthur [SMTP:m990198@nadn.navy.mil]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:50 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: burns 78% of fuel mix
Well, I dont want to poop on the parade, but engines dont really
burn 100%
of the fuel. That is why there is other things in the exhaust
besides
water and CO2. I mean I dont know if it is 78.5% or whatever
but that is
why advancing the timing makes more power, because it wasnt
burning all
the fuel. I doubt the Jacobs thing really makes a huge
difference though.
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 HEMI@charter.net wrote:
>
>
> If so...how did he come up with the 78%. Post the
> >facts/datasheets on your website.
> >
>
>
> If they posted something like that , D-C would be on them like
flys on
> doodoo !
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
> Jack Hilton III
>
> HEMI@charter.net
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:38 EDT