Most of the "Hypothetical Engines" i've put on my home dyno program all run
at around 83-88%. 78% is definately waaaaaayyyy tooooo low.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Jason
> Jennings
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:32 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: RE: DML: RE: burns 78% of fuel mix
>
>
> true it would be hard pressed to see 100% from a stock car. however, I
> think 78% is a bit low..... It just screams pollution police come and
> beat me now...
>
>
>
> Jason
> 2/18/99 8:37 AM
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Blount Arthur [SMTP:m990198@nadn.navy.mil]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 7:50 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: burns 78% of fuel mix
>
> Well, I dont want to poop on the parade, but engines dont really
> burn 100%
> of the fuel. That is why there is other things in the exhaust
> besides
> water and CO2. I mean I dont know if it is 78.5% or whatever
> but that is
> why advancing the timing makes more power, because it wasnt
> burning all
> the fuel. I doubt the Jacobs thing really makes a huge
> difference though.
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 HEMI@charter.net wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If so...how did he come up with the 78%. Post the
> > >facts/datasheets on your website.
> > >
> >
> >
> > If they posted something like that , D-C would be on them like
> flys on
> > doodoo !
> > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> >
> > Jack Hilton III
> >
> > HEMI@charter.net
> >
> > http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
> >
> > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:38 EDT