Re: Re: 5 Speed vs. Automatic -Reply -Reply

From: Gary Shook (gary.shook@mci.com)
Date: Sun Feb 28 1999 - 00:16:40 EST


Key word in my post was RATED.. New Venture guarantees the NV3500 in
applications rated for xxx Lbs Ft of torque (transmissions don't have
calculators, so they don't know about horsepower)... apparently the 5.9L is
above this number, or they would not have a problem running the NV3500
behind the 5.9L... they don't have a problem running the NV4500 behind the
5.9L (or the V10, or the Cummins)... what I don't understand is why they
have a problem running the NV4500 in the Dak or 1500 ram.... probably some
other lawyer's idea...

This is not reality of what EITHER transmission can take... it's bean
counter and lawyer negotiated stuff...

just my 2 copper/zinc disks worth..

Gary Shook

>Do you honestly think Chrysler would put in a transmission that would
>be marginal when subjected to a whopping 20hp extra? If you want the
>facts on the transmissions call Jim Bell. They blew a few autos
>running higher blower boost. The same boost levels they would only
>recommend running through a 5-speed. Neither of the trannys are really
>that strong if you try and lay big power to them.
>
>Brad
>
>
>
>
>---Patrick Delgado <dadoctah@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>
>> Soooooo....The 5 speed just doesn't have what it takes to handle the
>20 extra
>> horsies that the 360 puts out over the 318? But the auto can? Hmmmm.
>Very
>> interesting.
>> Dr. Pat
<massive snippage>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:46 EDT