Re: Re: Re: Done it.. (Die CAT!=) Check this out...

From: Dan Matthews (dakota_v6_89@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 02 1999 - 13:45:09 EST


Thats the EPAs sense of humor at work.---> "Lets take a perfectly good
truck that hauls real ass and lets put so many restrictions and mods on
it that it really sucks ass and gets poor gas mileage."

I just chopped off my cat conv. (shhhh!) and i gained all of my top end
back! It's such a shame that some wimp scumbag hippie who drives a ford
festiva and lives in downtown manhattan can tell average people like us
who live in big states (TEXAS!) and are forced to own cars to get us
around!

>From: Gary Shook <gary.shook@mci.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: Re: Done it.. (Die CAT!=) Check this out...
>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:01:04 -0700
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>
>That's an odd setup that I have not heard of before... I wonder what
the
>reasoning was for this setup?
>
>
>
>>Well this is what you are suppose to have: one (1) 02-sensor on each
>exhaust
>>manifold, one (1) 02-sensor between both inlet pipes on front of cat
and
>>finely one (1) 02-sensor about 1 foot after cat. This is if you have a
-99
>>Dakota R/T with 5.9 liter engine. If you have a 5.2 liter you only
have two
>>(2) 02-sensors. I think you should check it again, the numbers of
>>02-sensors. I work on these trucks all day long 5 days a week @
Huffines
>>Dodge in Lewisville, and I have checked it on more than 5 1999 R/T's
the
>all
>>had 4 02-sensors.
>>
>
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:01 EDT