Re: Re: J.B.A. vs EDELBROCK--headers

From: Jason&Sarah (Jpm699@email.msn.com)
Date: Mon Mar 08 1999 - 22:51:17 EST


I believe I got the JBA's with a ceramic coating and shipped for about $400.
What were the Edelbrocks?

Jason

>I chose the Edelbrocks, they are not bad, it only took 3 1/2 hours to
>install. The JBA's are better made, but they are twice the money as the
>Edelbrock. Mine gave me a 20 hp increase as measured with a G-tech. I have
>yet to run any 1/4 mile times, too much snow and salt (no traction).
>
>I have done a write up on them on my page http://home.att.net/~flyboy01
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mst29@aol.com <Mst29@aol.com>
>To: DML <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Monday, March 08, 1999 6:35 PM
>Subject: DML: J.B.A. vs EDELBROCK--headers
>
>
>>you more power? which are made better? does anybody have dyno results? i
>gotta
>>decide between the two.if more, how much more? thanx for any help.
>>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:05 EDT