Re: Re: Re: J.B.A. vs EDELBROCK--headers

From: Mark Kuzia (flyboy01@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Mar 08 1999 - 23:20:35 EST


$305 w/ Y-pipe. (+$3.00 for gas)

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason&Sarah <Jpm699@email.msn.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, March 08, 1999 10:54 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: J.B.A. vs EDELBROCK--headers

>I believe I got the JBA's with a ceramic coating and shipped for about
$400.
>What were the Edelbrocks?
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>
>>I chose the Edelbrocks, they are not bad, it only took 3 1/2 hours to
>>install. The JBA's are better made, but they are twice the money as the
>>Edelbrock. Mine gave me a 20 hp increase as measured with a G-tech. I have
>>yet to run any 1/4 mile times, too much snow and salt (no traction).
>>
>>I have done a write up on them on my page http://home.att.net/~flyboy01
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mst29@aol.com <Mst29@aol.com>
>>To: DML <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>>Date: Monday, March 08, 1999 6:35 PM
>>Subject: DML: J.B.A. vs EDELBROCK--headers
>>
>>
>>>you more power? which are made better? does anybody have dyno results? i
>>gotta
>>>decide between the two.if more, how much more? thanx for any help.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:05 EDT