Re: nada mucho

From: Sam Parthemer (rtdkota@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 30 1999 - 17:41:14 EST


Don't run the 160, as it will cause the computer to run in 'open' loop,
you'll get a error code that will
show itself in a check eng. light. 'Running too cold for too long',
plus you'll get crummy mileage.

Your webpage showed a dynojet run. Was that before or after your
mods??? 184 HP looks like a stock reading.
My '95 did 216 hp with roughly the same mods as you,
with the exception of DT headers, TB work, and a little bit difference
in the exhaust.

As far as the pinging, run 92 octane or better, 180
Tstat, colder range plugs, and 'expect' some pinging
underload from 4500-5200 rpm on warm, humid days.

Sam '99 RT RC (15.260 @ 89.654)
              (Mas Speed 128 mph)
    '99 RT CC (Max speed 112 mph)
    '95 SLT CC (15.3 @ 91.140)
              (Max speed 129-131+)
    '91 LE CC (Max speed was 85 mph)

--- Jon Smith <jdsmith4@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Picked up a 160 degree thermostat today to combat
> pinging. GOnna test it out on the Outer Banks
> tommorrow. If I don't see yall before Easter, hide
> your own eggs!!!!!!!!!!!
> ===
> Jon Smith -- NC
> '95 CC SLT 4x4 (15.908@85.79)
> 318 auto, MP comp, JBA headers, 8.5mm MSD wires, 14x3
> K&N, dual cat-back glasspacks, 180 degree thermo,
> spectre wire dividers
> http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jdsmith4/truck.html
> ICQ # 9720504
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:24 EDT