Re: MSD vs. Accel

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Apr 02 1999 - 08:24:51 EST

Next message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Truck Nationals @ Carlisle"
Previous message: Patrick Delgado: "Re: Where's my woofer????"
In reply to: brock skoloda: "MSD vs. Accel"
Next in thread: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[3]: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

So far, the MSD 6A seems to be the ignition box of choice.

Bernd D. Ratsch
Pflugerville, TX
bernd@texas.net
http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
1997 Dakota SLT-CC (3.9L)

> Has anyone had any experience with Accel 300+ ignition? Which would be
> the best for a v6, the MSD or the Accel. The accel comes in a kit with
> it's own coil, I would use the blaster III if I went with the MSD.
>

Next message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Truck Nationals @ Carlisle"
Previous message: Patrick Delgado: "Re: Where's my woofer????"
In reply to: brock skoloda: "MSD vs. Accel"
Next in thread: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Maybe reply: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[3]: Re: MSD vs. Accel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:38 EDT