Re: 2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??

From: fawcett@uism.bu.edu
Date: Mon Apr 05 1999 - 18:17:18 EDT

Next message: mike d. (Michael Z-Sykes): "RE: RE: Dakota R/T : 2 Birds : 0 -Reply"
Previous message: Michael Z-Sykes: "Re: Re: RE: E-way R/T spank -Reply"
Maybe in reply to: SuperNagz@aol.com: "2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I have the 3 chamber on my 318 CC 4x4... Nice rumble outside but very
quite inside the cab at all speeds.
T.

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: DML: 2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??
Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net> at smtpout
Date: 4/5/99 5:51 PM

I plan on simpily replacing my stock muffler on my 1999 R/T with a Flowmaster.

My question is should I go with a 2 or 3 chamber?

I know the 2-chamber will be louder than the 3... but is it TOO loud?

I want honest opinions..

Exactly how much louder than stock is the 3-chamber? and then how much
louder is the 2 chamber than the 3?

Thanks..

Next message: mike d. (Michael Z-Sykes): "RE: RE: Dakota R/T : 2 Birds : 0 -Reply"
Previous message: Michael Z-Sykes: "Re: Re: RE: E-way R/T spank -Reply"
Maybe in reply to: SuperNagz@aol.com: "2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 2 or 3 chamber Flowmasters on '99 RT??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:39 EDT