Re: Dynomax better than Flowmaster

From: Bob H (torch@triplet.net)
Date: Mon Apr 05 1999 - 23:16:45 EDT


Jim,

Thanks, think I will go this way.

At 09:55 PM 4/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> I would like to hear any comments on the Walker Dynomax Ultra Flo. I am
>> weighing this vs a Gibson single exit system. Seems alot cheaper way to go,
>> keeping the 2& a half pipes for low end torque and gaining some rumble and
>> performance, tho I do not want loud in the cab. Weighing the 2 options and
>> would like some input, thanks.
>>
>
>I believe the Ultra flow is probably one of the best flowing performance
>mufflers available. I don't know what is inside the Gibson, but the ultra
flow
>is straight through design. I don't understand why anyone uses a flowmaster
>for a performance muffler when it has baffles which have to create
backpressure
>and lower exhaust efficiency resulting in less horsepower.
>I don't think less power is what any of us want! I plan to get the 3"in dual
>2.5" out for my R/T with dual tailpipes. I already have the Mopar headers
so I
>believe that will be the best improvement I can buy.
>Jim in Waco
>99 R/T RC "Dakshak"
>
>
>
 ~~~~~Bob



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:39 EDT