Re: Re: RE: Re: Hedman headers?

From: Ryan D. Krokosinski (eqgroup@equinoxfinancial.com)
Date: Fri Apr 16 1999 - 11:41:18 EDT


Shorties = lots of low end but high end suffers.
Long Tubes = a little low end loss but lots of mid - high end power.
I think that the Leach headers are a good header for our trucks as they balance
out the low/high end. Especially since there really is no high RPM therefore no
real need for true long tubes. Long tubes would be like putting 3" duals on -
overkill and total loss of low end.
Tom's dak may be a different story though.

Ryan K
'99 R/T RC

Alan Short wrote:

> Tom & Fern Moffat wrote:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bridges, Bruce <bbridges@alarismed.com>
> > To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net' <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Date: Thursday, April 15, 1999 11:35 AM
> > Subject: DML: RE: Re: Hedman headers?
> >
> > >Tom,
> > >Have you called Kenne Bell? I think they make a long tube, 4 into one
> > >collector header for the Daks and Rams, kinda pricey though....
> > >BKB
> > >
> > I haven't yet. Do you know if it will fit around the motor mounts? There is
> > a couple of long tube headers for the 91 and older daks with the motor
> > mounts up front,but everyone I've tried to make work always hits the mounts
> > which are now mounted in the middle!
> > Please, can anyone tell me if the Leach is a true long tube design or
> > like the mopar-a equal length shorty. Is there pictures where I can actually
> > see one?
> > Thanks,
> > Tom(11s dak)
> I can definately tell you it is NOT a shorty header. It is right in
> between long tube and shorty in length. Like I said, the collectors
> terminate under the cab/firewall area.
> What's the big deal about long tubes anyway? Are they worth much more in
> HP?
> Alan S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:46 EDT