RE: digital camera comparisons

From: Sam Parthemer (rtdkota@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed May 26 1999 - 14:28:02 EDT


For near 35mm pictures, the Kodak DC260 (or newer 265) is the better
choice. I am saving up for that one.

Sam '99 RT x 2

--- "Densteadt, James" <james.densteadt@eds.com> wrote:
> So is the Olympus D340L a good camera and one
> someone on the list has used?
> I'm anxious to pick one up so any info you guys
> might offer would be
> helpful. I just want the best picture possible as
> cheap as I can get it.
> It seems like $289 for the Olympus is just right.
> What do you guys think?
> Soon to comes....pics of my truck and if I get it in
> time pics on the
> Chrysler showdown in Milan, MI.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Nichols [mailto:bnich@bellatlantic.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 1999 11:08 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: digital camera comparisons
>
>
>
>
> mrdancer wrote:
>
> > To whoever was looking for digital camera
> comparisons (sorry, forgot who
> you
> > were.....), check out this site:
> >
> >
> http://www.computers.com/product/item/0%2C31%2C0-21-688278%2C00.html
> >
> > Dak content: Hope you take some good pics of your
> Dak when you get your
> > camera :)
> >
> > '92 Dak CC 2wd 318 3.55
> > '84 GoldWing Interstate
>
> That was me, thanks for the info.....looks very
> informative
> Bob
> Lowered 1998 Metalic Red Extended Cab
> Western Chassis 2/4" Drop, Gibson Cat Back, Lund
> Roll Pan, Sport Masters
> Burgandy Tonnue, Home Grown K+N, F+B TB, Stillen
> Bumper Cover, Sony
> CDX-7850,
> Infinity Kappa's, MTX 275x, MTX Thunderform and a
> MTX 2130
> Visit my Dak at
> http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/factory/7995
>
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:09 EDT