Good points Jon. I may have to do this after a little more
research. If the sensor was calibrated for the hot intake,
it seems a cooler airhat would cause a *slightly* richer than
norm condition. Maybe better than having the system deal with
a resistor being switched in or out. Who knows? Need more input.
GS -
jdsmith4@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have thought about moving it into the airhat, not
> that I need fuel enrichment. My reasoning is that by
> moving the IAT off the intake manifold, the IAT temp
> (therefore resistence) will be closer to what the
> actual incoming air temp is. This may be more
> beneficial to those running ram air and not sucking in
> the hot underhood air.
>
> One of these days when I think about it, I'm gonna get
> a new IAT and mount in the cleaner housing, leaving
> the stock one in place as a plug... Just a thought
> though...
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:32 EDT