That's what I did on my 98 R/T. Replaced the stock Dynamax Ultraflow with a
3" in/out 2 chamber Flowmaster. I seem to have picked up a noticable amount
of top end, maybe just a slight loss in bottom. I needed the top end to get
ahead of those pesky Mustang GT's. Besides with 25,000 miles, I'm already
on my second set of GSA's (rears are just about worn again!) Could be a
little bit louder though.
GV 98 BL CC R/T
-----Original Message-----
From: jesse <pojess@home.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 9:27 PM
Subject: DML: Exhaust question
>I don't understand the cat-back exhaust upgrade. I looked under my
>Dakota and found that the exhaust from the CC back are at least 2.5 to
>3 inches in diamater, but the pipes from the engine were a lot smaller
>(maybe 1.5 to 2 inches). It seems that if I were only going to do a
>cat-back upgrade, I could save some money and just upgrade the muffler
>(free flow) and not get the piping. Does this make sense? Does anyone
>know if the stock pipes are mandrel bent.? Does it make that much of a
>differnce for a soon to be slightly modified truck? Any comments?
>
>1997 cc v6 auto
>soon to have 10" 360 degree air filter w/2.5 k&n filter, Jet power
>module, Gibson cat-back (depends on answers from post)
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:32 EDT