Re[2]: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Aug 11 1999 - 10:58:24 EDT


Robbed a Bank...well, kind of...raided my Piggy Bank. (Also saved up for
the entire "Snot Lift" over a period of 6 months.)

- Bernd

At 10:35 AM 08/11/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>Hey wait a minute! I've heard of Rancho, Trailmaster and Toughcountry
>lifts...
>How does this snot lift compare? Hehehe :-)
>
>Seriously though, these improvements are great... What did ya' do? Rob a
>bank
>Bernd?
>Tom
>
>____________________Reply Separator____________________
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90
>Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: 8/11/99 9:13 AM
>
>Ok...let me give you a little history on my Dak:
>
>(1) Purchased with 3.55 and 245/70 Tires
>(2) Installed 30" BFG's but acceleration sucked
>(3) Swapped 3.55's for 3.90's
>(4) Lifted the snot out of the truck and installed 32" BFG's
>(5) Swapped 3.90's for 4.10's
>
>On the overall scale, your statement it true. What I personally did was
>keep a ratio close to the stock one but allow the engine to turn the tires
>a little bit easier. My closest estimation is that i'm running 3.60's with
>the 32" tires and 4.10 gears. (I actually jacked up the rear end and
>counted the driveshaft revolutions compared to one tire revolution.)
>
>- Bernd



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:45 EDT