As long as there is an intake opening (or tube), it's not a problem. You
can mount it after the stock airbox on the tube, or fab your own intake
system. Now I can't speak for the '94 in particular, but if you have a
picture of your intake system, i'd be happy to find out for you what would
work best.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Mooberry, J
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 5:06 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: DML: RE: K&N Gen-II and eRam Setup
sounds wonderful. anybody know how you'd set up the eRam on a '94?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [SMTP:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 11:18 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: K&N Gen-II and eRam Setup
>
>
> Ok...three words:
>
> OH MY GOD!!
>
> This setup is the sh-t. I mounted/grafted a Super eRam to the front of a
> K&N Gen-II for my Dak and it is an awesome combination. The better/cooler
> air charge from the K&N combined with the boost from the eRam is
> definitely
> the was to go on our V6's. The only thing that had to be modified was the
> removal of 5" from the K&N Tube and a adapter for the 3" eRam to the 4"
> tube. Otherwise, the install was a snap. As for that heat shield that
> K&N
> delivers with the kit, that thing is a pain in the a$$ to install on a V6.
> I know, not designed for the V6...but i'll be taking my time on the
> re-fabrication to allow it to fit a little better. (It's off for now.)
>
> Anyway...The "Butt Dyno" feels the improvement, the speedo shows the
> faster
> acceleration, and the G-Tech tests will be run tomorrow.
>
> Pictures will be on the site in a few minutes.
>
>
>
> Bernd D. Ratsch
> Pflugerville, TX
> 1997 Dodge Dakota SLT/CC - 2WD
> http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
> bernd@texas.net
> ICQ: 39320084
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:49 EDT