Remember, Jim, "size doesn't matter!" ;-)
Seriously, I have the 51mm intake on my 5.2L, and it works great with my
JBA shorty headers, (talk about smaller!) but I'll find out more this
afternoon when the SoCal D's and Daks get finished at Carlsbad Raceway!
Skip
SoCal DOC
JHarmon wrote:
>
> Who you callin smaller cowpoke!
>
> John Mautz wrote:
>
> > I'm running the Quick D 51.75mm TB with Mesa Headers and Y-pipe on my 5.9L
> > Durango. I have noticed no ill effects and think it is great. Tony does
> > make a version a little smaller for the 5.2L.
> >
> > John
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> > >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> > >Kabuki2@aol.com
> > >Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 1:04 PM
> > >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Quick D
> > >
> > >
> > >In a message dated 9/8/99 10:06:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > >jmautz@home.com
> > >writes:
> > >
> > ><< I agree, Tony's Intake and TB are GREAT. Both have include great
> > > workmanship and both provided the desire results.
> > >
> > > John.
> > > '99 5.9L, 4x4, Durango >>
> > >
> > >I thought that 52mm was too large for a stock engine? Does anyone run this
> > >52mm TB w/ headers?
> > >
> > >ttyl
> > >Patrick
> > >
-- Shadowcatcher Imagery http://members.tripod.com/~shadowcatcherimagery/index.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:44 EDT