Re: Magnum engines

From: Terri Pryer (dzoo@arn.net)
Date: Sat Sep 25 1999 - 01:56:28 EDT


so if the bottom end is basically the same then could a few serious mods
like having the heads ported and so on hop the hp up considerably? up to
around the magnum range or over?
Mark
91 cc 5spd 6er
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Jack Hilton III <HEMI@charter.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Thursday, September 23, 1999 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Magnum engines

>
>
>
>Basically , the bottom end is the same as the pre-mags . The things that
>changed were better head design , fuel injection/induction , etc . In other
>words , everything with the exception of the block is different .
>
>
>
>At 09:00 AM 9/23/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> I'm in the middle of an argument with a co-worker between Dodge and
>>Ford and their engines. He is a die hard Ford fan who says you can't
>>beat the technology in the new Ford Triton engines compared to the old
>>Ford engines. He claims the same for Chebbies. When I started talking
>>about how Dodge now has the Magnum engines, which are also better than
>>previous Dodge engines. Now I'm told by several people here that all
>>Dodge did was rename their old technology with the Magnum name.
>>Considering I'm new to the Dodge line and am here for life (I just Love
>>my DAK), I want to be able to defend myself with more than just saying "
>>'cause it is better, that's why!" So, can someone please explain to me
>>the difference between the pre-Mag engines and today's Magnum?
>>
>>
>> Doug in Vermont
>> 98 CC,V6,4x4
>>
>>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>W. Jack Hilton III
>
>HEMI@charter.net
>
>http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
>ICQ#: 32611901
>
>AOL Instant Messenger: "DwnSth69"
>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:09 EDT