Re: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?

From: Erika Ipes (msbavior@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 25 1999 - 00:49:21 EDT


How many times has your vehicle been in for warranty work, and how many
miles do you have on the truck?

>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:53:32 -0400
>
>I got my truck back today, the very last day they had before the lemon law
>went into effect. THOSE BASTARDS!
>
>Mark
>Trans feels like new though, because it is.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Friday, September 24, 1999 12:39 AM
>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>
>
>|They had mine for 3 weeks, just to find out that I had to wait for a
>|computer flash.
>|
>|Erika
>|
>|
>|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
>|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:46:30 -0400
>|>
>|>Actually, the 100,000 mile warranty is what I wanted. All I really want
>is
>|>to GET MY TRUCK BACK! It has been at Arbor Dodge for 29 days strait.
>|>
>|>Mark
>|>
>|>
>|>-----Original Message-----
>|>From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
>|>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>|>Date: Thursday, September 23, 1999 6:59 PM
>|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>
>|>
>|>|For one... good luck. They will tell you in order to get another vehicle
>|>you
>|>|need to pay for tax tags and title all over again, you lose whatever
>money
>|>|you had down, and they deduct about 15 to 20 cents for every mile that
>is
>|>on
>|>|your vehicle. They will most likely offer you the 100,000 miles warranty
>|>|that has a $100 dollar detuctable. I tried to go after the lemon law
>too,
>|>|and this is what I went through. In other words, you GIVE them your
>truck,
>|>|and buy a NEW one at Cost. No trade, no nothing. The lemon law protects
>|>the
>|>|manufacturer and not the consumer. And in some states you can't even
>|>attempt
>|>|the lemon law if you are over 15,000 miles.
>|>|
>|>|Good luck.
>|>|
>|>|Erika
>|>|http://members.xoom.com/MsBavior/dakota
>|>|
>|>|
>|>|
>|>|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
>|>|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>|>|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>|>|>Subject: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>|>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 16:45:14 -0400
>|>|>
>|>|>Subject: Help! Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>|>
>|>|>
>|>|>Some of you have probably wondering why there have been no updates to
>my
>|>|>webpage page recently, the reason is that my truck developed
>transmission
>|>|>problems in July and has been in and out of service since.As a matter
>of
>|>|>fact, Today makes day # 33. I have already given Chrysler Corp. the
>Lemon
>|>|>Law notification.
>|>|>
>|>|>If anyone has had a Lemon Law case, please let me know what they are
>|>going
>|>|>to offer. I really just want my truck back, but I may never get the
>truck
>|>|>back because the Michigan Lemon Law gives the dealer a maximum of 30
>days
>|>|>to
>|>|>fix any problem with the vehicle. Last I checked, the transmissions are
>|>|>back-ordered for another 7 days, unfortunately, my truck has now been
>in
>|>|>service for 33 days! Looks like I might be getting a new truck or a
>|>payoff.
>|>|>
>|>|>If you were wondering what was wrong, I have made up a list of the
>|>problems
>|>|>below
>|>|>
>|>|>Date, Duration, Problem(s) / Solution(s).
>|>|>
>|>|>07/12/1999 1 day
>|>|>Broken cup-holder, fog lights inoperative, transmission not shifting
>into
>|>|>3rd gear. Cup holder was replaced, light switch
>|>|>was replaced, no work done on transmission, rescheduled
>|>|>for 07/26/1999.
>|>|>
>|>|>07/26/1999-07/30/1999 5 days
>|>|>Scheduled for transmission work, problem getting worse.
>|>|>Nothing was done until a tech test-drove it just before close
>|>|>of business on 7/28/99, I was told the parts were ordered.
>|>|>By 07/30/1999, the parts had still not shown up and I was
>|>|>told the tech was leaving on vacation that day. I picked up the vehicle
>|>and
>|>|>called the Chrysler Customer Service
>|>|>Department.
>|>|>
>|>|>08/26/1999-09/22/1999 28 days
>|>|>Excuses given; (1) wrong parts were ordered, (2) parts are
>|>|>backordered, (3) a tool needed to be ordered for the work,
>|>|>(4) the tool company lost the order because of a computer
>|>|>crash, (5) new transmission was ordered, (6) it was the wrong
>|>transmission,
>|>|>(7) another transmission is on order, (8) we dont break em', we just
>fix
>|>|>them!
>|>|>
>|>|>
>|>|>
>|>|
>|>|______________________________________________________
>|>|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>|>|
>|>
>|>
>|
>|______________________________________________________
>|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:09 EDT