RE: Edelbrock Performer RPM

From: Scott Miller (kmiller@cvn.net)
Date: Sat Mar 27 1999 - 15:33:05 EST


That's just great, cuz that's just what I'm getting.

and that's my final answer :~)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bob Tom
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 3:05 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Edelbrock Performer RPM
>
>
> > "Scott Miller" <kmiller@cvn.net> Writes
> > ... anybody hear anything about edelbrock rpm performers for a 360? ...
>
> It features 65cc combustion chambers, stainless 2.02 intake and
> 1.60 exhaust
> valves, hardened valve seats, hand-blended intake and exhaust valve bowls,
> CNC-machined port matching, heli-coiled rocker and exhaust bolt,
> and intake/
> exhaust ports as well as all factory head bolt bosses are in the stock
> location (LA 360 block).
>
> A 9.5:1 340 made 417hp@6000 and 397lb-ft torque@4500 with Eldebrock's
> Performer RPM heads (#6077), manifold (#7176), RPM cam-plus
> lifter (#7177),
> and Performer 750 cfm carb (#1407).
>
> Bottom line: a lot feel that these heads are perfect for the street and
> there's room for porting for those looking for more power.
>
> There's an article in Mopar Muscle, Nov. 98 on these heads.
>
> Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
> '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:35 EDT