This is for a 340 right? I mean I have heard that these will not bolt on to
a 5.9 or 5.2 right?
Bill
>From: "Scott Miller" <kmiller@cvn.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: RE: Edelbrock Performer RPM
>Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:33:05 -0500
>
>That's just great, cuz that's just what I'm getting.
>
>and that's my final answer :~)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bob Tom
> > Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 3:05 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Edelbrock Performer RPM
> >
> >
> > > "Scott Miller" <kmiller@cvn.net> Writes
> > > ... anybody hear anything about edelbrock rpm performers for a 360?
>...
> >
> > It features 65cc combustion chambers, stainless 2.02 intake and
> > 1.60 exhaust
> > valves, hardened valve seats, hand-blended intake and exhaust valve
>bowls,
> > CNC-machined port matching, heli-coiled rocker and exhaust bolt,
> > and intake/
> > exhaust ports as well as all factory head bolt bosses are in the stock
> > location (LA 360 block).
> >
> > A 9.5:1 340 made 417hp@6000 and 397lb-ft torque@4500 with Eldebrock's
> > Performer RPM heads (#6077), manifold (#7176), RPM cam-plus
> > lifter (#7177),
> > and Performer 750 cfm carb (#1407).
> >
> > Bottom line: a lot feel that these heads are perfect for the street and
> > there's room for porting for those looking for more power.
> >
> > There's an article in Mopar Muscle, Nov. 98 on these heads.
> >
> > Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
> > '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
> >
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:38 EDT