I agree with mike, we have used ss lines on dirt bikes and dune buggies, and
never had a problem. Also annother example could be found in the nhra rule
book, I dont have one handy, but they limate the ammount of rubber line used
on certified cars. it is required for fule systems due to its strength.
just my .02 cents worth... I also use ss lines on my 67 lemans after blowing
out two sets of rubber lines.
gregg
----- Original Message ----- >
>
> Mike,
> I think you're missing the point. I wont argue that SS covered brake
> hoses allow better braking then rubber. Granted, rubber expands, teflon
> does not. I wont argue that SS lines resist abrasion better than the
rubber
> lines. The problem with the SS lines is in fourwheeling/offroad
> applications (for the most part). Once dirt gets in the braid, its stuck
> between the SS and the teflon hose that the braid is protecting where it
> rubs it down till it breaks.
> I'm not sure what articulation and airplanes and temperature
> differences has to do with it. 300F is over the boiling point of DOT3
brake
> fluid. Vibration wise, I'm not sure what to say, my engine mounts are
> rubber?
> Sometimes, I think airplanes are great examples of "the right way to
do
> things" but I dont think this is the case. Airplanes have alot more to
deal
> with (temp and vibrations and such) that probably make SS lines a more
> viable solution for them, but not for us "earthbound" folks. Also, think
> about the safey inspections and maintanence schedules of airplanes
compared
> to your truck.
>
> --
> Dave
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:44 EST