Re: MSD6A ??

From: nosdakota (nosdakota@email.msn.com)
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 09:16:57 EST


I had no improvement in ET with the msd. Zero, zilch, nil, none, nada. The
only reason it's there is so I can retard my timing for the nitrous. I do
however have exact performance gains with both the hypertech and JET. they
were performed at Cecil after you left. Let me know and I'll post them
again.
Joe W.
87 Shelby Charger 13.9
98 Dakota 13.1

----- Original Message -----
From: EdMorris <Ed.Morris@thehartford.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 8:29 AM
Subject: DML: MSD6A ??

> Ok guys I have heard many opinions on this box. Has ne1 done a before &
after
> run at the track ?
> My current take is: The secondary coil voltage (4k) is not rated as high
as the
> stock coil(4k min - 6k max). So, screw the blaster. However, the box it
self
> has the multi spark feature below 3k. This is very appealing to me since I
> think I can pick up some low end torque , particularly with 1.6 RRs.
Please
> don't tell me to go with the Hi Po chip. Since the chip is not documented,
I
> have no interest at this time.
> So, wadda ya think ??
>
> \ | /
> Chief Little Ram o o
> >
> www



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:49 EST