Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Dec 10 1999 - 10:38:40 EST

Next message: GS-: "Re: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Previous message: A. S.: "Re: RE: Building my 5.2 for towing torque."
In reply to: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Next in thread: Dave Scelfo: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Maybe reply: Dave Scelfo: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yup.

At 09:43 AM 12/10/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>Just for my own edification, isn't a double wishbone rear suspension
>effectively
>I.S. as each wheel can move up or down independent of the other,
>right? Please
>enlighten me. You're right about the construction of the little 'uns. Solid
>little buggers aren't they.
>Tom

Next message: GS-: "Re: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Previous message: A. S.: "Re: RE: Building my 5.2 for towing torque."
In reply to: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Next in thread: Dave Scelfo: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Maybe reply: Dave Scelfo: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: IFS vs.live axle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:51 EST