Paul:
Sounds reasonable *if* the filler tube is the problem. However, since you
are able to see the problem with the filler tube, if you remove the tube
and the problem still exists (because something else is the culprit), you
may think the problem is resolved and not realize it still exists until
you (personally, not Jiffy Loob), change the oil. Not trying to whiz on
your cheerios, just trying to think along with you on this.
Richard in San Antonio
On Sat, 11 Dec 1999 06:42:36 EST BoogYT1300@aol.com writes:
>In a message dated 12/10/99 11:09:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>natedak2k@yahoo.com writes:
>
><<
> An idea - So, is it the length or presence of the filler tube that's
> causing this problem in the first place? What if the filler tube
>was
> somehow eliminated or drastically shortened, maybe relocated? Would
>this
> help? Of course I wouldn't have a clue on how to accomplish any of
>this,
> jsut throwin' ideas around!
> >>
>Thats what I was thinking too. Fabricate a plate to cover the hole
>and make
>a filler hole into the valve cover. like the system on the 239/318. I
>guess
>you would have to make a breather port too, that should solve the
>problem eh?
>Boog
___________________________________________________________________
Why pay more to get Web access?
Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:52 EST