Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube

From: Mst29@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 11 1999 - 11:59:47 EST

Next message: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: RE: RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Previous message: Mst29@aol.com: "REAREND INFO>>>>>>>"
Maybe in reply to: Todd Abernathy: "Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Next in thread: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

How much lighter is the new 4.7 as compared to the 318? ANybody have an exact
number from Mopar?

Next message: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: RE: RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Previous message: Mst29@aol.com: "REAREND INFO>>>>>>>"
Maybe in reply to: Todd Abernathy: "Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Next in thread: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:52 EST