Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube

From: Todd Abernathy (t_abernathy7@juno.com)
Date: Fri Dec 10 1999 - 19:29:44 EST

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: MP PCM #S"
Previous message: Ohm347@aol.com: "Re: Re: new to DML..."
Next in thread: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: BoogYT1300@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Frank Johnson: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The tradeoffs between the 5.2 and 4.7 are a wash ? "Vvveery
InnTerrresting" (said in a German accent).

So are there any DMLers that traded in a 5.2 for the 4.7 and would offer
an opinion if they would do it again ?

I'm NOT looking to stir anything up. I plan on buying a '00, after the
new year, and want the power of the V8 (disclaimer, I have nothing
against the V6ers). I have been reading the DML e-mails for about two
months now to get insight. I'm kind of back where I started, concerned
about the new engine without a history in the truck. I'm toying with
just buying a used 5.2. $20,000 plus is a lot of jack to spend be part
of a test group.
___________________________________________________________________
Why pay more to get Web access?
Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: MP PCM #S"
Previous message: Ohm347@aol.com: "Re: Re: new to DML..."
Next in thread: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: BoogYT1300@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Frank Johnson: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: Todd Abernathy: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Maybe reply: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Now: Would you get a 4.7 again, Was: Emulsion in the oil filler tube"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:51 EST