Re: 4.7 vs. 5.9

Next message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Are &quot;Old&quot; Rams any good?"
Previous message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re: 5 Star Service Centers"
Maybe in reply to: Boris Elpiner: "4.7 vs. 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: <A HREF="mailto:dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net?Subject=Re:%204.7%20vs.%205.9&In-Reply-To=&lt;0.b7c7d2fb.259b9e25@aol.com&gt;">[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: SuperNagz@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 29 1999 - 12:25:57 EST

Get the 360, you will not be dissapointed. Everybody knows that there is no
substitution for cubic inches... especially when it comes to torque

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:06 EST